Arthur Teboul
Founder of DokuTrak, client document collection software. I write about the one workflow that keeps slowing down professional service firms: getting complete, usable client documents without turning the job into an email chase.
About Arthur
I built DokuTrak after doing a lot of automation work for small firms and solo practitioners. Whatever the project, the same problem kept coming back: collecting documents from clients.
I am also co-founder and CPO of Sobrii, a B2B SaaS platform running on 15,000+ devices in production, where I own product, engineering, and growth. Before that I led growth at several B2B startups. I trained in business law and tax (Paris-Panthéon-Assas, HEAD) and management (emlyon) — the exact world that DokuTrak customers, from bookkeepers to law firms, work in every day.
DokuTrak comes from that mix: the problem I kept running into on automation projects, and a real feel for the professionals who deal with it every day. The product is intentionally narrow — secure no-account upload links, structured request lists, automated reminders, an AI first-pass that flags bad files, and human approval. No client account required.
Why document collection
Automation projects for small firms and solo practitioners tend to start somewhere else: a reporting chore, a billing step, a handoff between two tools. In my experience they kept running into the same wall. The work could not start until the client sent their documents, and the documents came in late, in pieces, by email, sometimes the wrong year or an unreadable photo.
No amount of automation downstream fixes a packet that never arrives complete. That is the one job DokuTrak does: a checklist of what you need, one upload link the client opens without an account, reminders until the packet is complete, and, if you switch it on, an AI first pass that flags a file that looks wrong. Someone at the firm accepts each file or marks it for re-upload. It is deliberately not a client portal: no messaging, no invoicing, no e-signatures.
My training in business law and tax is the reason the product and the articles lean on the rules as written. When a post touches a tax or legal procedure, it quotes the rule and links the source rather than paraphrasing it from memory.
How I check what I publish
I build DokuTrak, so I have a stake in every comparison I write. Comparison articles say so up front, and they name the cases where another tool is the better buy.
Competitor prices are read on each vendor’s own pricing page, and the article gives the date they were checked and the link. Statistics carry their original source; when a source goes offline and no primary copy can be found, the number comes out rather than staying on the page unsupported.
Articles about legal or tax procedures are not legal or tax advice. They say what the published rules say, and they tell you to check the current text before you rely on it.
What I write about
My articles focus on practical document intake workflows for US professional service firms: client portals, intake forms, request templates, AI document validation, and the operational cost of relying on email threads for sensitive paperwork.
Corrections and questions are welcome at arthur@dokutrak.com. If a price, a rule or a source on this site is out of date, that is the fastest way to get it fixed.
You can read the full company story on the about page, browse the DokuTrak blog, or connect with me on LinkedIn.