Clio alternative

The Clio Alternative
for Client Intake Specifically.

DokuTrak is not a Clio replacement — it fixes the one workflow Clio does poorly: getting documents from clients. Magic-link uploads bypass the Clio portal login wall that kills intake completion. $49/month flat, works alongside your existing Clio.

Why law firms add DokuTrak alongside Clio

01

The Clio client portal is where intake goes to die

Clio is excellent at billing, trust accounting, and matter management. The built-in client portal is the weak link: clients refuse to create accounts, verify emails, or set passwords. So you end up collecting by email, which is the workflow the portal was supposed to solve.

02

Magic Link is what the Clio portal cannot do

Client receives email, clicks link, uploads documents. No Clio account, no verification, no login page. DokuTrak lives alongside Clio — you keep Clio for the matter, use DokuTrak for the intake step.

03

Clio charges $69–$159 per seat, DokuTrak is $49 flat

A 5-attorney firm pays Clio at least $345/month, often double at higher tiers. DokuTrak adds $49/month flat for everyone. Total cost of adding the workflow that actually gets documents in: less than one billable hour.

04

You keep your Clio investment

You already trained the firm on Clio. You already migrated matters. You do not want to rip any of that out. DokuTrak is additive — use it only for the intake step, leave everything else on Clio. No data migration, no retraining.

DokuTrak vs Clio

Side-by-side on the points that actually matter for document collection.

FeatureDokuTrakClio
Magic Link — no client login
Flat price regardless of firm size$49/mo$69–$159/user
Client intake collectionPrimary workflowPortal (poor adoption)
Billing and invoicing
Trust accounting
Matter management
Time tracking
Calendaring
Reusable intake templates by matter typeLimited
Automatic remindersLimited
One-click reject + replacement
Works alongside Clio (no replacement)
Starting price for 5-attorney firm$49/mo total$345+/mo

Verdict — DokuTrak is not trying to replace Clio

Clio is the practice management standard for US law firms. It handles billing, trust accounting, matter management, time tracking, calendaring, reporting, and a dozen other things. If you are a law firm, you probably should use Clio (or MyCase, or PracticePanther) for those functions.

Where Clio falls short is the client portal, specifically the document intake step. Clio portal completion rates are notoriously low because clients refuse to create accounts. That single weakness forces firms back into email threads, which is the problem the portal was supposed to fix in the first place.

DokuTrak addresses that specific gap. Magic Link uploads — no client account, no password, no login — consistently get documents in where Clio portal workflows stall. At $49/month flat for the whole firm, it costs less than one Clio seat per month and adds the intake workflow that Clio itself does not deliver.

You keep Clio. You add DokuTrak. Your paralegals stop chasing passport scans by email.

Switch if…

  • Your Clio client portal has low adoption with actual clients
  • Your paralegals still chase documents by email despite having Clio
  • You want to fix intake without replacing your practice management tool
  • You want flat pricing for the intake layer, not per-seat scaling
  • You need intake templates by case type (I-130, PI demand, real estate closing)

Stay with Clio if…

  • You want a single tool that does everything Clio does plus intake
  • Your intake volume is low enough that email works fine
  • Clio portal adoption in your firm is already strong
  • You are looking to replace Clio, not complement it

DokuTrak pricing

$49/month flat

vs Clio at $69–$159 per user/month. $1 for the first 14 days.

Switch for $1

Clio vs DokuTrak FAQs

Can DokuTrak replace Clio?

No. Clio does billing, trust accounting, matter management, time tracking, calendaring, and a lot more. DokuTrak does one thing — document collection from clients — and does it better than Clio portal does that specific thing. You keep Clio for the 90% it handles well, add DokuTrak for the 10% it does poorly.

Does DokuTrak integrate with Clio?

Not natively yet. Current workflow: client uploads via DokuTrak, you download the completed intake as a zip, upload the documents into the matching Clio matter. Native Clio integration is on our 2026 roadmap. Until then, the workflow takes about 30 seconds of copy-paste per matter after intake completion.

Why is DokuTrak so much cheaper than Clio?

Because DokuTrak does one thing and Clio does 50. Clio pricing reflects the full suite. DokuTrak is scoped to document collection specifically, which lets us charge $49/month flat. We are not trying to be a 50-feature suite — we are trying to nail the one workflow that every law firm we meet says is broken.

Do you have case-type templates for immigration, PI, real estate?

Yes. You build templates once per case type (I-130 filings, PI demand packages, real estate closings, criminal defense discovery) listing every document you need. Reuse across every similar matter in three clicks. The firm-wide template library is shared across all attorneys and paralegals.

Is DokuTrak secure enough for attorney-client privileged documents?

AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, EU-hosted in Paris, GDPR-compliant, full audit log. Documents uploaded via Magic Link are in the normal attorney-client communication context. DokuTrak staff does not have read access to document contents under normal operation. Security documentation available under NDA. More at /security.

Can I use DokuTrak for intake without telling Clio?

Yes, that is the typical workflow. Clio does not need to know. You send a DokuTrak Magic Link for the intake step, the client uploads, you download the zip, you upload to the Clio matter record. Clio sees a matter with attached documents. Your paralegal sees a workflow that actually works.

Ready to switch from Clio?

$1 for 14 days. Send your first request in under three minutes. Cancel in one click if it doesn't fit.

Start trial for $1